How AI-Assisted Content Creation Affects Self-Media Creator Authenticity and Audience Trust
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6911/Keywords:
AI-assisted content creation, self-media, authenticity, audience trust, generative AI, structural equation modeling, elaboration likelihood model.Abstract
With the growing popularity of self-media platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Bilibili, generative AI has been gradually embraced by creators to achieve large-scale content generation, including text, images, and videos. These tools can help increase productivity but can also lead to questions about the authenticity of the content creator and trust by their audience. In this paper, a structural model is developed that combines the Elaboration Likelihood Model and technology-mediated trust theory to explore the causal link between AI disclosure, perceived content quality, perceived authenticity and audience trust. Structural equation modeling is used to analyze a quantitative survey of 427 users of social media. The results show that the perception of authenticity plays a mediating role between disclosure of AI use and audience trust. If the content is of high perceived quality, with the help of AI, it may be able to mitigate the negative trust effect of the use of AI, but only if the creator has a consistent personal voice. In the trust function, comparative statics show that disclosure has a nonlinear effect on the marginal effect of disclosure. The results not only provide theoretical insights for research into communication in the context of AI but also serve as a guide for self-media creators dealing with the integration of generative AI tools.
Downloads
References
[1] C.S. Suri, S.S. Shukla, R. Pal, V. Srivastava, G. Talele, & M.K. B. (2024). Generative AI in content creation: Opportunities and ethical challenges. In 2024 IEEE 11th Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
[2] Epstein, Z., Hertzmann, A., Akten, M., Farid, H., Fjeld, J., Frank, M.R., Groh, M., Herman, L., Leach, N., & Investigators of Human Creativity. (2023). Art and the science of generative AI. Science, 380(6650), 1110–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh4451
[3] Cunningham, S., & Craig, D. (2019). Social media entertainment: The new intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley. NYU Press.
[4] Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008
[5] Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
[6] Jakesch, M., Hancock, J.T., & Naaman, M. (2023). Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(11), e2208839120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208839120
[7] Köbis, N., & Mossink, L.D. (2021). Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106553
[8] Enke, N., & Borchers, N.S. (2019). Social media influencers in strategic communication: A conceptual framework for strategic social media influencer communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1620234
[9] Hancock, J.T., Naaman, M., & Levy, K. (2020). AI-mediated communication: Definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz022
[10] Karinshak, E., Liu, S.X., Park, J.S., & Hancock, J.T. (2023). Working with AI to persuade: Examining a large language model's ability to generate pro-vaccination messages. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579592
[11] Longoni, C., & Cian, L. (2022). Artificial intelligence in utilitarian vs. hedonic contexts: The "word-of-machine" effect. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211066353
[12] Liu, Y., & Shrum, L.J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53–64.
[13] Valsesia, F., Proserpio, D., & Nunes, J.C. (2020). The positive effect of not following others on social media. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1152–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720915467
[14] Kim, A., & Dennis, A.R. (2019). Says who? The effects of presentation format and source rating on fake news in social media. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/15188
[15] Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
[16] Sundar, S.S. (2020). Rise of machine agency: A framework for studying the psychology of human-AI interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026
[17] Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52.
[18] Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
[19] Hayes, A.F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
[20] European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 World Scientific Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




