Macrophage Polarization Signatures from RNA-seq Identify Therapeutic Exosomal miRNA Payloads for Muscle Regeneration: An Open, Reproducible Computational Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6911/Keywords:
Exosomes; microRNA; macrophage polarization; muscle regeneration; gene set enrichment analysis; combinatorial therapy; reproducible research.Abstract
Background. Exosomal microRNA (miRNA) cocktails are emerging as cell-free regenerative therapeutics for skeletal muscle injury. Existing payload-design tools nominate candidate miRNAs through abundance ranking or curated literature screens; few benchmark their selections against random baselines or report exhaustive search, so apparently optimal payloads can simply recapitulate prior knowledge.Methods. We re-analysed GSE212372, a 2×2 factorial RNA-seq study of mouse tibialis-anterior macrophages (n=12; anti-TNFα neutralising antibody × Ifngr1 wt/null vs. null/null). Differential expression was performed with pyDESeq2 with Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Pre-ranked gene set enrichment analysis was run with gseapy against MSigDB Hallmark, KEGG, GO Biological Process and WikiPathways libraries. Leading-edge genes from pathways at FDR<0.10 were connected to 16 exosomal miRNAs through a literature-curated bipartite graph of 84 validated miRNA-target interactions. Each miRNA was scored by the sum of |NES| over its real differentially expressed targets. Payload-of-four selection was evaluated by greedy top-K, exhaustive enumeration of all (16¦4)=1820 combinations, and comparison against 1000 random combinations using z-score and one-sample t-test. Results. Across 15,137 filtered genes, anti-TNFα blockade produced 13 DEGs at padj<0.05 with subtle effects on cytoskeletal, migration and proliferation genes (Plxna1, Mmp14, Ccr2). Ifngr1 ablation produced two strict DEGs but pervasive pathway-level collapse of interferon-γ response (NES =-2.35, FDR =0.024). GSEA recovered 35/50 Hallmark pathways at FDR<0.25 in the anti-TNFα contrast: paradoxical up-regulation of TNFα/NF-κB (NES =+2.24), IL-6/JAK/STAT3 (+1.84) and interferon-α response (+2.00), with concurrent suppression of Myc, E2F, G2-M, mTORC1 and glycolysis programs. Greedy and exhaustive search agreed on the unique optimum: miR-155 + miR-146a + miR-125b-5p + miR-21, score 26.86, z=3.72, p<10-300 versus random baseline, 100th percentile. Conclusion. A bipartite scoring framework anchored in real RNA-seq leading-edge genes recovers a different payload (immune regulators) from the one a literature-only prior would suggest (muscle myo-miRs). The pipeline is open, dataset-agnostic and fully scripted in eight files. It is intended for in silico payload prioritisation prior to wet-lab validation.
Downloads
References
[1] Tidball, J. G., Welc, S. S., & Wehling-Henricks, M. (2023). Immune-derived signals in muscle regeneration: An updated synthesis. Annual Review of Physiology, 85, 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-031621-101007.
[2] Chazaud, B. (2024). Macrophages: Supportive cells for skeletal muscle regeneration – 2024 update. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 81(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05132-3
[3] Xiang, S., Gilbert, T. M., et al. (2023). Spatial and temporal mapping of macrophage subsets in muscle regeneration by integrated single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. Nature Communications, 14, 7298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43156-8
[4] Larouche, J., Greising, S. M., & Aguilar, C. A. (2022). Multi-omic dissection of skeletal muscle injury models reveals macrophage heterogeneity. Nature Communications, 13, 6710. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34428-w
[5] Welsh, J. A., Goberdhan, D. C. I., et al. (2024). Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): From basic to advanced knowledge. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, 13(2), e12404. https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12404
[6] Kim, H. J., Park, S. Y., & Lee, S. Y. (2024). Engineered exosomes for combinatorial miRNA delivery: Design principles and translational hurdles. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 204, 115171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2023.115171
[7] Bi, Y., Qiao, X., Cai, J., et al. (2024). Hypoxic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes promote muscle satellite cell activation through miR-210-3p targeting KLF7. International Immunopharmacology, 142, 113143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113143
[8] Xie, T., Liang, Y., Yu, Z., et al. (2025). BMSC-derived exosomal miR-126-5p targets FBXO32/MyoD axis to promote skeletal muscle regeneration. Acta Physiologica, 241(3), e70114. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.70114
[9] Li, X., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025). Fibroblast-activated-protein-positive exosomal miR-125b-5p drives macrophage M2 polarisation in skeletal muscle regeneration. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 16, 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-025-04452-w
[10] Kim, M. J., Park, S.-H., et al. (2025). Platelet-rich plasma derived exosomes accelerate muscle recovery via integrated miRNA-mRNA reprogramming. Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 57(3), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-025-01606-x
[11] Lu, H., Han, X., Yang, H., et al. (2024). Myogenic exosomal miR-140-5p attenuates skeletal muscle injury via TGF-β/Smad pathway suppression. Aging (Albany NY), 16(9), 7857–7873. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.205617
[12] Zhou, W., Wang, Y., Tang, B., et al. (2025). Combinatorial exosomal miRNA therapy for skeletal muscle injury: A systematic review of preclinical studies (2020-2024). Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 14(2), sztae079. https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/sztae079
[13] Kalra, H., Drummen, G. P. C., & Mathivanan, S. (2024). Vesiclepedia 2024: An extracellular vesicles compendium with continuous community annotation. Nucleic Acids Research, 52(D1), D1389–D1395. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1062
[14] Liu, T., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., et al. (2022). EVAtlas: A comprehensive knowledgebase for ncRNA expression in human extracellular vesicles. Nucleic Acids Research, 50(D1), D111–D117. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab668
[15] Huang, H.-Y., Lin, Y.-C.-D., Cui, S., et al. (2022). miRTarBase update 2022: An informative resource for experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Research, 50(D1), D222–D230. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1079
[16] Liu, X., Yang, T., Han, X., Lyu, B., & Cui, L. (2023). GraphTar: A graph-attention network approach for miRNA-target interaction prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 24(2), bbad068. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbad068
[17] Wang, J., Li, H., et al. (2024). Multi-task hypergraph neural network for miRNA-target prediction across cell types. Bioinformatics, 40(3), btae129. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae129
[18] Li, D., Yu, X., et al. (2023). Multi-task learning improves miRNA target prediction by jointly modelling sequence, structure and accessibility. Nucleic Acids Research, 51(16), e88. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad541
[19] Collister, D., Greene, C. S., & Tasaki, S. (2024). Statistical anchoring of multi-target therapeutic combinations: A benchmark protocol. Patterns, 5(1), 100894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100894
[20] Varga, T., Mounier, R., et al. (2022). TNF-α and IFN-γ cooperate for efficient pro- to anti-inflammatory transition of macrophages during muscle regeneration. Cell Reports, 41(3), 111522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111522
[21] Muzellec, B., Telenczuk, M., Cabeli, V., & Andreux, M. (2023). PyDESeq2: A Python package for bulk RNA-seq differential expression analysis. Bioinformatics, 39(9), btad547. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad547
[22] Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology, 15(12), 550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
[23] Fang, Z., Liu, X., & Peltz, G. (2023). GSEApy: A comprehensive package for performing gene set enrichment analysis in Python. Bioinformatics, 39(1), btac757. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac757
[24] Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57(1), 289–300.
[25] Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., et al. (2005). Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(43), 15545–15550. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102
[26] Krasniewski, L. K., Chakraborty, P., Cui, C.-Y., et al. (2022). Single-cell analysis of skeletal muscle macrophages reveals age-associated functional subpopulations. eLife, 11, e77974. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77974
[27] Lai, H., Li, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2022). exoRBase 2.0: An atlas of mRNA, lncRNA and circRNA in extracellular vesicles from human biofluids. Nucleic Acids Research, 50(D1), D118–D128. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1085
[28] Ratti, M., Lampis, A., et al. (2025). miR-155 in macrophage biology: A 2025 update on therapeutic targeting. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(3), 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26031209
[29] Paterson, M. R., & Kriegel, A. J. (2022). miR-146a: A master regulator of innate immunity and a therapeutic target in inflammation. Frontiers in Immunology, 13, 917768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.917768
[30] Schulte, L. N., Westermann, A. J., & Vogel, J. (2021). Differential roles of miR-21 in immune cells: A quantitative review. Trends in Immunology, 42(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2020.12.008
[31] Martinez-Sanchez, A., Murray, H., et al. (2023). miR-125b orchestrates macrophage activation through IRF4 and KLF13. iScience, 26(7), 107131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107131
[32] Huang, Y., Liu, J., et al. (2023). Extracellular vesicle biomarker discovery using machine learning and deep learning. Biomarker Research, 11, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-023-00540-2
[33] Vega, M., Sanchez, A., et al. (2025). AI-powered liquid biopsy and extracellular vesicle analysis: A roadmap for clinical translation. Clinica Chimica Acta, 566, 120484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2025.120484
[34] Chen, T., Yang, B., et al. (2023). Exosomal microRNA networks in skeletal muscle homeostasis and disease: A 2023 perspective. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 34(6), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2023.03.005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 World Scientific Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




