The Impact of Adjustments to Time-of-Use Tariff Policies on the Usage Behaviour of New Energy Vehicle Charging Infrastructure

Authors

  • Xinyao Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6911/

Keywords:

Time-of-use pricing, New Energy Vehicles, Charging facilities, Structural equation modelling, Resource allocation.

Abstract

Driven by the strategy for green and low-carbon transition, the development of charging infrastructure for new energy vehicles faces the coupled challenge of fluctuating demand and the optimisation of resource allocation. This paper utilises the time-of-use tariff policy adjustment implemented by the Jibei Power Grid on 1 January 2026 as a natural experiment. Questionnaire surveys were conducted at two time points—before and after the policy announcement—and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was employed to empirically analyse the mechanisms through which the policy adjustment influences the charging behaviour of new energy vehicle users. Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and demand response theory, the study constructs a conceptual model comprising five latent variables: perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, policy awareness, subjective norms, and willingness to adjust charging behaviour. A total of 669 valid questionnaires were collected from the two rounds of surveys. Data tests indicated that the data met the normality assumption, with no severe common method bias. Harman’s single-factor variance explained was 29.8%, and all VIF values in the multicollinearity diagnostics were less than 3; furthermore, the model used in this study outperformed competing models. The study found that: (1) The policy adjustment significantly enhanced users’ perceived sensitivity to electricity price signals, with the mean willingness to adjust charging behaviour rising from 3.18 to 4.09, an increase of 28.6%; (2) Policy awareness is the most critical factor influencing the willingness to adjust, with a path coefficient of 0.428 (p < 0.001), and it plays a significant mediating role between perceived usefulness and the willingness to adjust, accounting for 34.9% of the indirect effect; (3) Perceived usefulness (0.347) and subjective norms (0.186) have a significant positive impact on the willingness to adjust, whilst perceived ease of use exhibits a slight negative impact (-0.124); (4) Multi-group analysis indicates that the path coefficients for perceived usefulness and policy awareness significantly increased following the policy announcement; (5) There is a marked disparity between users’ willingness to adjust and the availability of charging facilities during specific time slots: during the winter off-peak period (12:00–15:00), the availability of charging points in office areas was only 31.8%, whilst during the summer peak period (18:00–21:00), the congestion rate of residential charging points reached 67.2%. This paper provides theoretical grounds and empirical support for the refined design of time-of-use pricing policies and the coordinated optimisation of new energy vehicle charging infrastructure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Hu Zheng, Xu Yingzhi, Wu Bowei. A Study on the Impact and Mechanisms of Digital and Intelligent Development on the Low-Carbon Transition of Energy Consumption [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2026, 41(5): 1578–1599.

[2] Nie Hongguang, Yu Huiru. A Study on the Effectiveness of Local Government Subsidies for New Energy Vehicles against a Background of Policy Overlap [J/OL]. Contemporary Finance, 1–14 [16 April 2026].

[3] Ma Hui, Li Hao, Li Huangqiang, et al. A Review and Outlook on Green Energy Systems for Inland Waterway Ports [J/OL]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering, 1–22 [16 April 2026].

[4] Yang Wei, Zhang Ning, Song Jinwei, et al. A Review of Research and Application Prospects for Carbon Emission Factors in the Power Sector [J/OL]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 1–17 [16 April 2026].

[5] Wang He, Li Wenchao, Bian Jing, et al. A Multi-level Economic Operation Optimisation Method for Flexible Interconnected Distribution Networks Based on Voltage Quality Zoning [J/OL]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 1–19 [16 April 2026].

[6] Dong Xiaoliang, Wang Yuxuan, Zhang Shengnan, et al. Analysis of the Current Status and Prospects for the Market Participation of Integrated Generation-Grid-Load-Storage Projects [J]. China Electric Power, 2025, 58(11): 49–61.

[7] Luo Z ,Zhang J ,Li H , et al.An innovative assessment methodology for energy storage economics using mismatch characteristic between electricity price and building demand[J].Journal of Energy Storage,2026,160121857-121857.

[8] Szondy B ,Biró B ,Bodnár B , et al.Scenario-based assessment of the role of nuclear units’ flexibility in an electricity grid with high intermittent renewable penetration[J].Energy Strategy Reviews,2026,65102199-102199.

[9] Ye Chusheng, Wang Ruijiao, Li Xiaoyu. Institutional Openness, Green Financial Supply and Corporate Green Development [J/OL]. Contemporary Finance and Economics, 1–13 [16 April 2026].

[10] Ge Le, Tu Shanqing, Wang Mingshen, et al. An Optimised Dispatching Strategy for Electric Vehicle Charging and Discharging Taking into Account User Response Willingness [J/OL]. Modern Power, 1–12 [16 April 2026].

[11] Hu Xianfeng. A Study on the Mechanism of Consumer Purchase Intentions for New Energy Vehicles and Guiding Policies from an Information Perspective [D]. University of Science and Technology of China, 2024.

[12] Wang Jing, Yang Yong, Huang Xin. Can Rural Households’ Participation in the Digital Economy Boost Tourism Consumption? — An Empirical Study Based on Data from the China Household Finance Survey [J/OL]. Journal of Tourism Studies, 1–26 [16 April 2026].

[13] Li Yue, Zhang Yongjie, Shen Dehua. The Mediating Role of Stock Discussion Forums in the Stock Market: Investor Attention or Sentiment? [J]. Systems Science and Mathematics, 2026, 46(4): 1064–1085.

[14] Zhang Hua. The Mechanism of Public Charging Service Satisfaction from the Perspectives of Service Perception and Group Heterogeneity [J]. Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 45(6): 227–236.

[15] Ge Yilin, Qian Tao, Hu Qinran, et al. Design of an Open-Source Testing Platform for AI Control Algorithms for Vehicle-Grid Interaction [J/OL]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering, 1–14 [16 April 2026].

[16] Li Junxiang, Li Yuanrui, He Jianjia, et al. Intelligent Optimisation Algorithm for Real-time Grid Pricing Based on the Analyses of Supply and Demand Function Characteristics [J/OL]. Theory and Practice of Systems Engineering, 1–18 [16 April 2026].

[17] Huang Mingjie, Zeng Xiangjun, Zhang Binqiao, et al. Multi-agent Coordination Optimisation Strategy for Distribution Networks Based on Spatio-temporal Coordinated Dispatching of Electric Vehicles [J/OL]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering, 1–14 [16 April 2026].

[18] Wang Chudi. A Study on Bounded-Rationality Charging Decisions and Vehicle-Station-Grid Co-optimisation [D]. Shenyang University of Technology, 2023.

[19] Yang Yan, Yin Weichuan, Sun Lianying, et al. Analysis of Factors Associated with Charging Behaviour of New Energy Ride-Hailing Users Based on the SEM Model [J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2024, 48(3): 39–47.

[20] Xiong Renjiang, Zhao Hang. A Study on Urban Residents’ Intentions to Use Electric Vehicles Considering Public Charging Station Satisfaction [J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 40(4): 49–57.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, X. (2026). The Impact of Adjustments to Time-of-Use Tariff Policies on the Usage Behaviour of New Energy Vehicle Charging Infrastructure. World Scientific Research Journal, 12(5), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.6911/