Research on Low-Carbon Scheduling of Energy-Intensive Projects Considering Multi-Mode Resource Constraints and Dynamic Electricity Prices

Authors

  • Lihua He Department of Southwest Petroleum University, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6911/

Keywords:

Low-carbon scheduling; Multi-mode resource constraints; Dynamic electricity prices; NSGA-III algorithm.

Abstract

Energy-intensive industries constitute the primary source of energy consumption and carbon emissions. To achieve the "Dual Carbon" goals, advancing the low-carbon transformation of such industries is of vital significance. Nevertheless, current production scheduling for energy-intensive projects rarely coordinates time-of-use electricity prices, multi-shift production and low-carbo requirements in an integrated optimization framework. To address this gap, this study develops a multi-objective scheduling framework incorporating multiple resource scheduling rules and dynamic fluctuations in energy prices. The framework pursues three optimization objectives: minimizing carbon emissions, cutting energy costs, and maintaining reasonable project durations. Interms of numerical solution, this paper improves the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III) and adopts the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine the weight of each objective, thereby realizing dynamic equilibrium of scheduling schemes under multiple constraints. Case verificat on demonstrates that the proposed model can effectively reduce carbon emissions and energy expenditures of energy-intensive projects while improvin resource utilization efficiency. The research outcomes can provide practical guidance and references for low-carbon production scheduling in energy-intensive industries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Hartmann, S., & Briskorn, D. (2010). A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.002.

[2] Zhang, X., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). Multi-objective resource-constrained project scheduling with fuzzy activity durations. Automation in Construction, 129, 103852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103852

[3] Wang, C., Li, X., & Zhang, N. (2020). Demand response-based scheduling for industrial users under time-of-use pricing. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11(6), 4987–4998. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2020.2992118

[4] Li, Y., Liu, C., & Chen, H. (2022). Energy-cost optimization for industrial processes considering time-varying electricity prices and carbon emissions. Energy, 239, 122567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122567

[5] Chen, G., Zhang, L., & He, Y. (2021). Carbon-emission-constrained project scheduling using particle swarm optimization. Journal of Environmental Management, 286, 112231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112231

[6] Zhao, H., Wang, J., & Li, Z. (2020). Integrated scheduling of production and carbon trading for manufacturing enterprises. Applied Energy, 277, 115598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115598

[7] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). Provincial Greenhouse Gas Inventory Compilation Guidelines (2022 Version).

[8] Development and Reform Commission of XX Province. (2024). 2024 Industrial Time-of-Use Electricity Price Policy.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

He, L. (2026). Research on Low-Carbon Scheduling of Energy-Intensive Projects Considering Multi-Mode Resource Constraints and Dynamic Electricity Prices. World Scientific Research Journal, 12(8), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.6911/